Your cart is empty.
Joe T. Patterson and the White South's Dilemma - Evolving Resistance to Black Advancement

Joe T. Patterson and the White South's Dilemma

Evolving Resistance to Black Advancement

By Robert E. Luckett Jr.
Hardcover : 9781496802699, 304 pages, 11 b&w illustrations, August 2015
Paperback : 9781496809551, 312 pages, 11 b&w illustrations, October 2016

How white resistance operated and adapted to the sweeping forces of racial change


As Mississippi's attorney general from 1956 to 1969, Joe T. Patterson led the legal defense for Jim Crow in the state. He was inaugurated for his first term two months before the launch of the Sovereignty Commission—charged “to protect the sovereignty of Mississippi from encroachment thereon by the federal government”—which made manifest a century-old states' rights ideology couched in the rhetoric of massive resistance. Despite the dubious legal foundations of that agenda, Patterson supported the organization's mission from the start and served as an ex-officio leader on its board for the rest of his life.

Patterson was also a card-carrying member of the segregationist Citizens' Council and, in his own words, had “spent many hours and driven many miles advocating the basic principles for which the Citizens' Councils were originally organized. ” Few ever doubted his Jim Crow credentials. That is until September 1962 and the integration of the University of Mississippi by James Meredith.

That fall Patterson stepped out of his entrenchment by defying a circle of white power brokers, but only to a point. His seeming acquiescence came at the height of the biggest crisis for Mississippi's racist order. Yet even after the Supreme Court decreed that Meredith must enter the university, Patterson opposed any further desegregation and despised the federal intervention at Ole Miss. Still he faced a dilemma that confronted all white southerners: how to maintain an artificially elevated position for whites in southern society without resorting to violence or intimidation. Once the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Meredith v. Fair, the state attorney general walked a strategic tightrope, looking to temper the ruling's impact without inciting the mob and without retreating any further. Patterson and others sought pragmatic answers to the dilemma of white southerners, not in the name of civil rights but to offer a more durable version of white power. His finesse paved the way for future tactics employing duplicity and barely yielding social change while deferring many dreams.


"Luckett provides a valuable, comprehensive account of Patterson's work on the state's behalf. "

- Neal Allen, The Journal of American History, Vol. 103, No. 3

"Luckett masterfully weaves together a plethora of primary and secondary sources to produce a compelling narrative of Patterson's career. Without casting judgement, the author points out the determination of white people in Mississippi to hold on to yesterday. The book is a must-read for those interested in understanding the civil rights movement and the legal strategies used to fight it. "

- Abel A. Bartley, The Journal of Southern History

"The dilemma was how to protect segregation without breaking the law, and it was the job of Mississippi attorney general Joe T. Patterson to figure out how to do both. Luckett's volume is one of the most intricate studies so far of what scholars are calling 'practical segregation,' the effort to preserve the privileges of white southerners without harsh language, violence, openly racist organizations and the bad publicity they created, or outright opposition to the federal government. This book is full of surprises, and it shows what scholars can accomplish by studying conflicts over the methods of preserving white supremacy."

- Ted Ownby, director of the Center for the Study of Southern Culture

"Luckett's work is invaluable in revealing the more complex story of white resistance to black advancement across the South and its formative role in conservatism nationally, with legacies in today's political climate. His arguments allow those who strive for equality to develop more nuanced strategies for positive social change and reveal the challenges faced by activists whose opponents are willing to accommodate some measure of progress in order to maintain the white supremacist social order. It should be required reading for all of us."

- Susan M. Glisson, executive director of the William Winter Institute for Racial Reconciliation